[Bug c++/43333] [4.5 Regression] __is_pod seems broken
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Mon Mar 22 16:54:00 GMT 2010
------- Comment #10 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-22 16:54 -------
Hmm, well, but there's code out there that expects the "old" TR1 semantic,
namely blocxx, and if the definition is indeed muddled than IMNSHO we should
retain the behaviour as it was in older GCC versions, instead of breaking
existing code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43333
More information about the Gcc-bugs
mailing list