This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin?
On Sat, 2 Feb 2019 at 01:12, Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@inria.fr> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106#c15 , Arthur O'Dwyer
> suggests that the name __is_trivially_relocatable would be a good name for
> a future builtin, and we should use something else for this class. Does
> anyone have an opinion on whether we should rename and what other name we
> should use? I am tempted by __is_trivially_relocatable__,
> _Is_trivially_relocatable or ___is_trivially_relocatable ...
We have a mixture of __do_{your chosen name goes here} and {your
chosen name goes here}_impl
throughout the library. There's no real chosen policy for it. I have
strong objections to playing
games with the amount of underscores, library maintainers don't see
them. :) My suggestion
is to rename the current one to __is_trivially_bitwise_relocatable.