This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin?
- From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 00:12:45 +0100 (CET)
- Subject: Reserve __is_trivially_relocatable for a builtin?
- Reply-to: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Hello,
in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87106#c15 , Arthur O'Dwyer
suggests that the name __is_trivially_relocatable would be a good name for
a future builtin, and we should use something else for this class. Does
anyone have an opinion on whether we should rename and what other name we
should use? I am tempted by __is_trivially_relocatable__,
_Is_trivially_relocatable or ___is_trivially_relocatable ...
--
Marc Glisse