This is the mail archive of the libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the libstdc++ project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)

From: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely at redhat dot com>
Cc: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 21:59:21 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1809011549480.12789@stedding.saclay.inria.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1809012146290.16381@stedding.saclay.inria.fr> <20180902200345.GU4149@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810131047210.27931@stedding.saclay.inria.fr> <20181013121308.GX23172@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.21.1810131819300.27931@stedding.saclay.inria.fr> <20181015092630.GY23172@redhat.com>

On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Jonathan Wakely wrote:

That's a good enough reason for me. Unless one of us implements
noexcept(auto) in GCC and Clang in the next few days, let's go with
what you have in the patch :-)

Just checking: this 'ok' is for the noexcept style, it is not a review forthe complete patch yet, right?


--
Marc Glisse

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

References:
- Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)
  - From: Marc Glisse
- Re: Relocation (= move+destroy)
  - From: Jonathan Wakely

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]