This is the mail archive of the
libstdc++@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the libstdc++ project.
Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
- From: Paolo Carlini <paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com>
- To: libstdc++ at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: Marc Glisse <marc dot glisse at inria dot fr>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2013 17:42:12 -0500
- Subject: Re: Remove algo logic duplication Round 3
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <52409F6F dot 7040609 at gmail dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309232317070 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240B539 dot 1050202 at oracle dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309232345420 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240BA10 dot 4090400 at oracle dot com> <alpine dot DEB dot 2 dot 10 dot 1309240028450 dot 4088 at laptop-mg dot saclay dot inria dot fr> <5240C28A dot 4040402 at oracle dot com>
Hi again,
On 9/23/13 5:36 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
Funny, I don't remember making that comment at all, and isn't that old ;)
... but wait, that bug report is *not* about an inline in a member
function declaration. Is about an inline in a free standing function. I
definitely agree with myself about that comment.
Did you read all the comments in the audit trail? Do you think the bug
report is relevant for the specific issue we are discussing today, that
is *member* functions defined in the body with/without an explicit inline?
Paolo.