This is the mail archive of the
java@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: cni-changes documented?
Adam Megacz writes:
>
> root <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> > This wil make no difference *at all* to anyone who has an MMU that
> > does trap on null pointer accesses;
>
> Ah, right.
>
> BTW, I'm not too knowledgeable on the gory details of C++ templates,
> but would smart pointers let us do precise GC?
I've been discussing this with Hans. The answer is a definite
"maybe"! :-)
Really, it all depends on what restrictions we're prepared to put on
the writers of CNI code. I reckon the necessary restrictions are
quite reasonable, but I haven't been able to persuade Hans. So, the
jury is out.
Andrew.