This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: cni-changes documented?

From: Adam Megacz <adam at megacz dot com>
To: "java at gcc dot gnu dot org" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 04:05:31 -0800
Subject: Re: cni-changes documented?
Organization: Myself
References: <1079424309.3229.7.camel@jaques2><16471.2428.230887.239761@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><m1d67caupd.fsf@nowhere.com><16472.9373.749283.140123@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

root <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> This wil make no difference *at all* to anyone who has an MMU that
> does trap on null pointer accesses;

Ah, right.

BTW, I'm not too knowledgeable on the gory details of C++ templates,
but would smart pointers let us do precise GC?

  - a

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cni-changes documented?
  - From: Andrew Haley

References:
- cni-changes documented?
  - From: Jakob Praher
- cni-changes documented?
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: cni-changes documented?
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: cni-changes documented?
  - From: root

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]