This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: cni-changes documented?

From: Adam Megacz <megacz at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: "java at gcc dot gnu dot org" <java at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:50:06 -0800
Subject: Re: cni-changes documented?
Organization: Myself
References: <1079424309.3229.7.camel@jaques2><16471.2428.230887.239761@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com>

Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> writes:
> What we must do, however, is switch from using pointers to using smart
> pointers: this is a matter of declaration rather than use.  

Forgive my ignorance, but why?  Or perhaps point me at the relevant
documentation.  I really like the fact that in CNI "a pointer is a
pointer" :)

  - a

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cni-changes documented?
  - From: root

References:
- cni-changes documented?
  - From: Jakob Praher
- cni-changes documented?
  - From: Andrew Haley

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]