This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: omit-frame-pointer

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: Ranjit Mathew <rmathew at hotmail dot com>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:17:26 +0000
Subject: Re: omit-frame-pointer
References: <16452.42460.455230.894096@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><m1vfll1t17.fsf@nowhere.com><16455.1744.810152.414989@cuddles.cambridge.redhat.com><c273f0$apu$1@sea.gmane.org>

Ranjit Mathew writes:
 > Andrew Haley wrote:
 > > Adam Megacz top-posted:
 > [...]
 > >  > BTW, rth posted a patch back in '99 that cuts DWARF2 debug info down
 > >  > to 20% of its usual size when -fno-omit-frame-pointer is the case.
 > > 
 > > What happened to it?  Why wasn't it committed?
 > 
 > Whether it was committed or not, even now the DW2
 > information generated with -fomit-frame-pointer is
 > bigger than with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.

You'd expect that: the stack management is more complicated.

Andrew.

References:
- omit-frame-pointer
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: omit-frame-pointer
  - From: Adam Megacz
- Re: omit-frame-pointer
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: omit-frame-pointer
  - From: Ranjit Mathew

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]