Re: omit-frame-pointer

[Adam Megacz <megacz at gcc dot gnu dot org>]

This still works, and I have verified that it still results in a huge
reduction in .eh_frame.

  http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/1997-10/msg00569.html

  - a

Ranjit Mathew <rmathew@hotmail.com> writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>> Adam Megacz top-posted:
> [...]
>>  > BTW, rth posted a patch back in '99 that cuts DWARF2 debug info down
>>  > to 20% of its usual size when -fno-omit-frame-pointer is the case.
>> 
>> What happened to it?  Why wasn't it committed?
>
> Whether it was committed or not, even now the DW2
> information generated with -fomit-frame-pointer is
> bigger than with -fno-omit-frame-pointer.
>
> You can verify it by looking at the generated
> assembler code.
>
> Ranjit.
>
> -- 
> Ranjit Mathew          Email: rmathew AT hotmail DOT com
>
> Bangalore, INDIA.      Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/
>
>

-- 
"It's lucky," he added, after a pause, "that there are such a lot of
islands in the world.  I almost envy you, Mr. Watson."

                                                   -- Mustapha Mond