This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Rmi compilation to native code

From: Eric Blake <ebb9 at email dot byu dot edu>
To: Mark Wielaard <mark at klomp dot org>
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 02:38:49 -0700
Subject: Re: Rmi compilation to native code
Organization: BYU Student
References: <3C7589EF.6070601@umassd.edu> <3C7591C7.3030009@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <20020222112957.O424@bapli> <3C76B0D2.40406@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <873cztqf7w.fsf@creche.redhat.com> <1014456619.19146.17.camel@elsschot>

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> 
> Basically saying, always use the same compiler to compile your classes
> or break serialization. Sigh. I haven't found documentation of the
> precise changes or how their new javac generates synthetic method names,
> etc.

The Jikes compiler does not produce compatible files, either.  The
serialVersionUID is just TOO sensitive on undocumented,
compiler-dependent synthetic methods, so your only safe bet is to always
explicitly specify what you meant, or use a single version of a single
compiler.

-- 
This signature intentionally left boring.

Eric Blake             ebb9@email.byu.edu
  BYU student, free software programmer

References:
- Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: u_a1bargnesi
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: John Leuner
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Mark Wielaard

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]