This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Rmi compilation to native code

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
Cc: John Leuner <jewel at pixie dot co dot za>, u_a1bargnesi at umassd dot edu, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 22 Feb 2002 16:17:07 -0700
Subject: Re: Rmi compilation to native code
References: <3C7589EF.6070601@umassd.edu> <3C7591C7.3030009@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <20020222112957.O424@bapli> <3C76B0D2.40406@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Bryce" == Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> writes:

Bryce> If they don't, there can be problems in some cases due to inner
Bryce> classes etc having slightly different flags and synthetic
Bryce> method names under GCJ compared to javac, all of which effect
Bryce> the SerialVersionUID calculation.

Is this fixable?  Could you file a PR for it?  It would be nice to
have full compatibility here if possible.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Mark Wielaard

References:
- Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: u_a1bargnesi
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: John Leuner
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Bryce McKinlay

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]