This is the mail archive of the java@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the Java project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Rmi compilation to native code

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce at waitaki dot otago dot ac dot nz>
To: John Leuner <jewel at pixie dot co dot za>
Cc: u_a1bargnesi at umassd dot edu, java at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:57:54 +1300
Subject: Re: Rmi compilation to native code
References: <3C7589EF.6070601@umassd.edu> <3C7591C7.3030009@waitaki.otago.ac.nz> <20020222112957.O424@bapli>

John Leuner wrote:

>
>What about functionality of serialization. Does it work? Is it compatible with the other JDK's?
>

It does work, and interoperability with the JDK seems to be fine as long 
as your class has an explicit SerialVersionUID. If they don't, there can 
be problems in some cases due to inner classes etc having slightly 
different flags and synthetic method names under GCJ compared to javac, 
all of which effect the SerialVersionUID calculation.

regards

Bryce.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Tom Tromey

References:
- Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: u_a1bargnesi
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: Bryce McKinlay
- Re: Rmi compilation to native code
  - From: John Leuner

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]