This is the mail archive of the
java-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the Java project.
Re: Patch: update libgcj configury
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 02:12, Andreas Tobler wrote:
> Already tested here :)
>
> So, what took me a while:
>
> You have to run aclocal -I . to get the gtk/glib things in.
>
I'm not sure that the -I . is necessary; the Makefile.am line:
ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I .
should tell aclocal the proper flags.
> autoheader warns:
>
> autoheader: WARNING: Using auxiliary files such as `acconfig.h',
> `config.h.bot'
> autoheader: WARNING: and `config.h.top', to define templates for
> `config.h.in'
> autoheader: WARNING: is deprecated and discouraged.
> autoheader:
> autoheader: WARNING: Using the third argument of `AC_DEFINE' and
> autoheader: WARNING: `AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED' allows to define a template
> without
> autoheader: WARNING: `acconfig.h':
> autoheader:
> autoheader: WARNING: AC_DEFINE([NEED_FUNC_MAIN], 1,
> autoheader: [Define if a function `main' is needed.])
> autoheader:
> autoheader: WARNING: More sophisticated templates can also be produced,
> see the
> autoheader: WARNING: documentation.
>
Right, I should have mentioned: don't run autoheader :-) It overwrites
include/config.h.in which has some necessary local changes.
> autoconf ok so far.
>
> automake complains:
>
> [titanium:gcc-cvs-dylib/gcc/libjava] andreast% automake
> Makefile.am: required file `../compile' not found
> Makefile.am: required file `../depcomp' not found
>
automake -a should do the trick.
> Do we care about?
>
> Also, what makes me curious:
>
> [titanium:gcc-cvs-dylib/gcc/libjava] andreast% ll Makefile.in
> -rw-r--r-- 1 andreast staff 9450554 10 Dec 07:58 Makefile.in
>
> Hey, nearly 10Megs for Makefile.in :)
>
Wow, I hadn't checked that. I did notice a drastic increase in the time
automake takes to run, though. I guess we'll have to investigate.
> Build runs now and I report asap.
>
Thanks!
Tom