This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?

From: Joseph Myers <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:48:12 +0000
Subject: Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?
References: <6f84c126-136e-7f6d-ec69-4775a58610a4@redhat.com> <CAFiYyc2oaW5K4S7O1eEinHKaq7Q1HyyjhJ=4ODwtnaXatLioPQ@mail.gmail.com> <eec8269a-e570-7ed2-dafb-379bf2f1acd7@redhat.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1807202102570.27257@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <CAFiYyc2NWnYPhVu+TJeD5rvQaULkTo68Bppgbo+a=+GirxB=6g@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 23 Jul 2018, Richard Biener wrote:

> Does -L "work" with codebases that become more and more C++?  I do realize

Well, you can specify an arbitrary regular expression for your funcname 
line with -L if you need to.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?
  - From: Trevor Saunders

References:
- ChangeLog's: do we have to?
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?
  - From: Joseph Myers
- Re: ChangeLog's: do we have to?
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]