This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
On 1/19/2017 6:33 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 01:26:32PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:On Jan 19 2017, Tristan Gingold <gingold@adacore.com> wrote:Is it ok to require gcc 4.9 (3 years old) or later to build GNAT ?The newest Ada compiler available for SLE11 is 4.8.Various people still use 4.4 or even 4.1 as bootstrap compilers. While 3 years old requirement is way better than the Rust nonsense (only support bootstrap with 6 weeks older Rust and not older), it is still not good enough for GCC IMHO.
I still see a lot of people using CentOS/RHEL 6 which has gcc 4.4.7. This is particularly true of large organizations. What does CentOS/RHEL 7 have for gcc? What would be the procedure to get a recent GNAT on these distributions? For RTEMS, we use very recent (6.3.0) gcc for our cross tools but usually don't have to worry about updating the native compiler. CentOS 6 is not a problem to build up to date cross tools on currently.
Jakub
--joel
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |