This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Moving to git
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "gcc\ at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 09:00:57 +0200
- Subject: Re: Moving to git
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55D61512 dot 8010002 at redhat dot com> <55D61B23 dot 3000309 at redhat dot com> <55D63403 dot 4000603 at redhat dot com> <20150824081741 dot GB9425 at tucnak dot redhat dot com> <mvmwpwl85a9 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <20150824170831 dot GO9425 at tucnak dot redhat dot com>
Jakub Jelinek <email@example.com> writes:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 10:22:22AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Jakub Jelinek <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > And for those really identifying them by sha1 hashes is significantly
>> > worse than using monotonically increasing small number, sha1 hashes
>> > are impossible to remember, and you don't know what is earlier and
>> > what is later from just looking at it.
>> git describe gives you such a number (relative to a tag).
> But it is not unique across different branches,
It can't be, due to the distributed nature of git.
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, email@example.com
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."