This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Moving to git
- From: Andreas Schwab <schwab at linux-m68k dot org>
- To: Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana dot gcc at googlemail dot com>
- Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com>, ramrad01 at arm dot com, Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>, Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, "gcc\ at gnu dot org" <gcc at gnu dot org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2015 16:09:11 +0200
- Subject: Re: Moving to git
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55D61512 dot 8010002 at redhat dot com> <55D61B23 dot 3000309 at redhat dot com> <55D63403 dot 4000603 at redhat dot com> <CAJA7tRahuaA36w76YD0nE+6ur1Y8T1ThZ8ssSmGgRmzT9bUcBA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAH6eHdTcMMgHBax=x42aAE+LdRyKnzNhaLxvc_VcPQVP_P7nog at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAJA7tRYwEMxTrFmFNYg0Mh9QTLyNOtVPH7kjjSTzS82RPyXHfQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
Ramana Radhakrishnan <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Jonathan Wakely <email@example.com> wrote:
>> Teams following a different model could use a separate repo shared by
>> those developers, not the gcc.gnu.org one. It's much easier to do that
>> with git.
> Yes you are right they sure can, but one of the reasons that teams are
> doing their development on a feature branch is so that they can obtain
> feedback and collaborate with others in the community.
It is also much easier for others to pull from foreign repositories with
git, so this isn't a severe downside.
Andreas Schwab, firstname.lastname@example.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."