This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted
- From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje dot gcc at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>, Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, jeremy dot bennett at embecosm dot com, David Edelsohn <edelsohn at gnu dot org>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 09:31:42 +0100
- Subject: Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5249A23F dot 8000901 at embecosm dot com> <CAFiYyc0Uo_UOo6tBSVtXJK4giQLiL6BhWWJA3=grds8deA3qMA at mail dot gmail dot com> <524A9173 dot 30301 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc3ZJe_1XOOY5MeRD4UjOnc=KS9B1eTrgjPATT4OHNC-=A at mail dot gmail dot com> <524ACD05 dot 2020701 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc1q+hEeL5L2bwU_8fMW4SDSYBKdyG-xikRK_cgHF=mAkw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131001101941 dot n710f8j688owg4oo-nzlynne at webmail dot spamcop dot net> <524AE8FF dot 2010101 at redhat dot com> <CAGWvny=r1=CSaPt+Vtj_rP2wdiKP8F9TOuKMEnJ6g0iA=NTuxQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On 10/02/2013 12:47 AM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> It is unfortunate that global reviewers are so busy that they cannot
> review the few, infrequent new port submissions. But I find it very
> distasteful for someone to hyperventilate because other, busy people
> don't do something that appears obvious.
I'm sure you do, but I find it far more distasteful to have a willing
volunteer blocked for so long under such circumstances. This is not
the way that we should be doing things.
Andrew.