This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted
- From: Joern Rennecke <joern dot rennecke at embecosm dot com>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, jeremy dot bennett at embecosm dot com, David Edelsohn <edelsohn at gnu dot org>, GCC Development <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:19:41 -0400
- Subject: Re: Getting the ARC port reviewed and accepted
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5249A23F dot 8000901 at embecosm dot com> <CAFiYyc0Uo_UOo6tBSVtXJK4giQLiL6BhWWJA3=grds8deA3qMA at mail dot gmail dot com> <524A9173 dot 30301 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc3ZJe_1XOOY5MeRD4UjOnc=KS9B1eTrgjPATT4OHNC-=A at mail dot gmail dot com> <524ACD05 dot 2020701 at redhat dot com> <CAFiYyc1q+hEeL5L2bwU_8fMW4SDSYBKdyG-xikRK_cgHF=mAkw at mail dot gmail dot com>
Quoting Richard Biener <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
Good. So what remains is the configure parts, the libgcc parts and
the documentation parts. Though for all of them they look ARC
specific so maybe the maintainership covers these as well.
I suppose this automatism when being assigned the maintainership
escaped Joern as well ... ;)
I knew that the maintainership in general covers the relevant config
and testsuite bits as well as the port specific directories, but David
said at my appointment as maintainer:
: The GCC SC has approved acceptance of the port and you as maintainer.
: I will announce that shortly. Because the patches that you want to
: include in GCC 4.8 are localized to the port, I think that it still
: should be possible to merge it into trunk (assuming the RMs agree),
: but you still need a Global Reviewer to approve it.