This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:41:28 -0500
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <mcrhblnnuz3.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <xnzkzepj8q.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <mcrwruiihi8.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <AANLkTik9pWKYXihpKBik_JDh3U00WVfomdYvwDOU6FyA@mail.gmail.com> <mcrfx16ialj.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <201006020005.o5205Z6F027231@greed.delorie.com>

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:05 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Right, but it may happen some day. ?Also there is the issue of
>> clarity. ?I think it is clearer to see this->get() rather than get().
>
> this->put_size (this->get_bounds (this->get_x(), this->get_y()),
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?this->get_variance (this->default_variance ()))
>
> I'd like to avoid needing to assign "this->" to a hotkey in emacs.
>

I agree that the "this->" is overly rigid.

FWIW, we already have C++ style in the GCC distribution -- see libstdc++.
Not all of it has to be imported (for example, the uglification stuff
makes no sense.)

References:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]