This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 19:43:53 -0500
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <mcrhblnnuz3.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <xnzkzepj8q.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <mcrwruiihi8.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <201006012141.o51LfGTl007586@greed.delorie.com> <mcrk4qiiard.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <201006020003.o5203RHg027186@greed.delorie.com>

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:03 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:

> Maybe you and I have completely different ideas about how the whole
> class heirarchy works. ?I'm not a firm believer that the base-most
> class should be an empty shell of a class that does nothing but
> provide a placeholder for umpteen direct-but-leaf derived classes.

I would recommend against the idea that the root class of a hierarchy
shall be empty -- except if it is an interface, e.g. an abstract class.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Basile Starynkevitch

References:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]