This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2010 20:05:35 -0400
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <mcrhblnnuz3.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <xnzkzepj8q.fsf@greed.delorie.com> <mcrwruiihi8.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com> <AANLkTik9pWKYXihpKBik_JDh3U00WVfomdYvwDOU6FyA@mail.gmail.com> <mcrfx16ialj.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>

> Right, but it may happen some day.  Also there is the issue of
> clarity.  I think it is clearer to see this->get() rather than get().

this->put_size (this->get_bounds (this->get_x(), this->get_y()),
                this->get_variance (this->default_variance ()))

I'd like to avoid needing to assign "this->" to a hotkey in emacs.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Richard Kenner

References:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Jonathan Wakely
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]