This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: åææ <chiheng dot xu at gmail dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
Cc: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 18:30:39 +0800
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <4C030228.8020201@codesourcery.com> <201005310850.52926.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <m34ohov3ap.fsf@hase.home> <201005311148.22320.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <4619EA28-AC1B-4012-A4B9-164013FF075E@gmail.com>

On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On May 31, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:
>
>>> C90 does not have long long either, yet we use it as required (for HWI).
>>
>> No, we use it when present but we don't require it, see hwint.h.
>
> Kinda. It depends on the host and target. If the target requires 64bit host
> wide ints then we require long long for 32 bit hosts. An example is a cross
> compiler from x86 to alpha.
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Eric Botcazou
>

You can encapsulate HWI in an ADT(abstract data type).

I think compiler can and should be host independent, like LLVM.

-- 
åææ(Chiheng Xu)
Wuhan,China

References:
- Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]