This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gmail dot com>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab at redhat dot com>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 02:54:07 -0700
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <4C030228.8020201@codesourcery.com> <201005310850.52926.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <m34ohov3ap.fsf@hase.home> <201005311148.22320.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

Sent from my iPhone

On May 31, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com> wrote:

C90 does not have long long either, yet we use it as required (for HWI).
No, we use it when present but we don't require it, see hwint.h.

Kinda. It depends on the host and target. If the target requires 64bit host wide ints then we require long long for 32 bit hosts. An example is a cross compiler from x86 to alpha.


--
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: åææ

References:
- Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]