This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: åææ <chiheng dot xu at gmail dot com>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 06:41:23 -0400
Subject: Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
References: <4C030228.8020201@codesourcery.com> <AANLkTimzVEXsE4vOZJuegnHFu-pVyNdKImcasoSX_ZDc@mail.gmail.com>

åææ wrote:

I have FUD on the use of "advanced" C++ features like template(even
standard template), namespace, exceptions. This is partly because my
favorite source code analyzer can not handle them properly. I have
tried to use my favorite source code analyzer to analyze LLVM source
code, which use C++ standard template aggressively, the result is not
ideal . I also have tried to use it to analyze Open64 source code,
which does not use template, the result is much better .It would be
nice if there are another template-free encapsulation over standard
template.  For example, an template-free container encapsulating
standard container template.


It's a pity to exclude namespaces, the advantage of breaking the
single-big-namespace model are evident.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: åææ
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Richard Guenther

References:
- Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: Using C++ in GCC is OK
  - From: åææ

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]