This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?

From: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Doug Gregor <dgregor at cs dot indiana dot edu>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 20:32:35 +0200
Subject: Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
References: <468D08DF.4050103@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707051712200.24708@zhemvz.fhfr.qr> <468D2A51.4020402@codesourcery.com> <468D2E26.8090804@suse.de> <468D2F22.4050704@codesourcery.com> <468D3193.5080507@suse.de> <468D32BD.7090502@codesourcery.com> <468D3625.401@suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707052032200.24708@zhemvz.fhfr.qr>

Richard Guenther wrote:

Excellent. Let's see if we can have some performance numbers (from Richard ;)

Uh, I know of no thing that uses complex numbers and does not manually implement them.

Crazy. I understand both in C and in C++, right?

Therefore, we should consider your observation in favor of simply enabling method 2 everywhere and be done with it?

Paolo.

References:
- flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Paolo Carlini
- Re: flag_complex_method = 2 in C++?
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]