This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Re; Maintaining, was: Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size
Kazu Hirata <kazu@codesourcery.com> writes:
> Hi Ian,
>
> >> I don't see why:
> >>
> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html
> >>
> >> was a bad thing. i think gcc would have been better if it had just
> >> been committed.
> > Not fair. Zack himself says the patch is not recommended for commit,
> > and it just a baseline for further work. For this kind of target
> > specific change, I think it is best to let the target port maintainers
> > make the call. I've CC'ed the maintainers listed for h8. Perhaps
> > they will take a look at it.
>
> I am aware of the define_constraints patch. I am thinking about
> working on the H8 and M68K ports at least. How urgent is this? FWIW,
> I've reproduced the ICE that Zack mentioned, but I haven't
> investigated it.
It's not urgent at all.
Ian