This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Re; Maintaining, was: Re: Reduce Dwarf Debug Size

Hi Ian,

I don't see why:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg02031.html

was a bad thing.  i think gcc would have been better if it had just
been committed.


Not fair.  Zack himself says the patch is not recommended for commit,
and it just a baseline for further work.  For this kind of target
specific change, I think it is best to let the target port maintainers
make the call.  I've CC'ed the maintainers listed for h8.  Perhaps
they will take a look at it.

I am aware of the define_constraints patch. I am thinking about working on the H8 and M68K ports at least. How urgent is this? FWIW, I've reproduced the ICE that Zack mentioned, but I haven't investigated it.

Kazu Hirata

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]