This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
On 2007-01-16 21:27:42 +0000, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> > I suspect that the best fix, in the sense of generating the best
> > code, would be to do this at the tree level. That will give loop
> > and VRP optimizations the best chance to eliminate the test for -1.
> > Doing it during gimplification would be easy, if perhaps rather
> > ugly. If there are indeed several processors with this oddity,
> > then it would even make a certain degree of sense as a
> > target-independent option.
> x86, x86-64, S/390, as far as I'm aware.
and PowerPC G4 and G5, where I don't get a crash, but an incorrect
result (as said on PR#30484).
Vincent Lefèvre <firstname.lastname@example.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arenaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)