This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions

From: David Daney <ddaney at avtrex dot com>
To: Roberto Bagnara <bagnara at cs dot unipr dot it>
Cc: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:05:20 -0800
Subject: Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
References: <45AB8770.5040402@cs.unipr.it> <45AD0BB0.4040506@adacore.com> <45AD1257.3040700@cs.unipr.it> <45AD141A.4040506@avtrex.com> <45AD200C.2060902@cs.unipr.it>

Roberto Bagnara wrote:


Hmmm, it says nothing about the remainder.  Can some Google guru
suggest how to prove or disprove the claim that what we are
talking about is wildly known?

The point really is not how widely/wildly known the issue is. Really the thing we consider on gcc@ is: What is the 'best' thing for GCC and the GCC developers to do.

I don't claim to speak for others, but until now this issue has not seemed all that pressing. And it still doesn't.

David Daney

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Miscompilation of remainder expressions
  - From: Roberto Bagnara
- Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
  - From: Roberto Bagnara
- Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
  - From: David Daney
- Re: Miscompilation of remainder expressions
  - From: Roberto Bagnara

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]