This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.


Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu> writes:

> On Jul 23, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> 
> > "Me too."
> 
> Except now you have suggested that we change the current behavior
> which you already suggested at the GCC summit we should not do at
> least not for a couple of release for warning people.  You cannot
> have it both ways, people already depend on this behavior, I am
> one example.

My general point at the gcc summit was not one about changing the
compiler, although that was the context in which I raised it.  It was
that we should have more consideration of the needs of our users, and
less consideration of the needs of our developers.

As far as I am concerned, the relevant question on this issue is
whether anybody other than toolchain developers depends on the current
behaviour.  I believe the answer is no.  Since the current behaviour
has various drawbacks which are clearly evident in organizations which
use NFS widely, and since moreover I believe that most non-gcc-
developers do not exepect the current behaviour, I believe that we
should change it.

Ian


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]