This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: named warnings & individual warning control
On Jun 25, 2004, at 5:18 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
and users don't seem to have changed much.
and one of the recent complain was...
That is exactly the problem. I was just shown some code that is
performance-critical. And initializing the variables twice just to
appease the compiler, was just too expensive. Hence it would be nice
1) The compiler were smarter, and didn't generate a bogus warning