This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [RFC] type safe trees
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Matt Austern <austern at apple dot com>
- Cc: gdr at acm dot org, Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>, zack at codesourcery dot com, gcc <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:39:53 -0700
- Subject: Re: [RFC] type safe trees
- References: <40D994BE.3080208@codesourcery.com> <"37466.::ffff:24.250.169.187.1088004869.squirrel"@webmail.nerim.net> <EEE3CDB0-C53A-11D8-BEE8-000A95AA5E5E@apple.com>
On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 10:29:51AM -0700, Matt Austern wrote:
> On Jun 23, 2004, at 8:34 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> >So, we don't want C++, we find C too restrictive in the expressive
> >power it gives us and we end up inventing a new language we
> >have to learn?
[...]
> If we think we need a language with class hierarchies but
> with a C-like syntax, our compiler already supports two
> good choices.
I Concur.
r~