Re: gccbug reports?

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>]

On Jun 14, 2004, at 10:19 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:01:44PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Jun 14, 2004, at 9:54 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > > When you say fixed, do you mean my next bootstrap and install
> > > will update the gccbug script to give valid components?
> >
> > No, I mean that it won't cause it to ignore the report :)
> >
> > I've no idea what component is now gone that is still in gccbug. If 
> > you
> > could tell me what component you had used on those reports, it would 
> > be
> > helpful, so that i can remove it from the gccbug script.
>
> The "Category" for 2 of the missing reports was "fortran" and the
> 3rd report's "Category" was "optimization".

This is the component (or rather, gets translated into the component).
optimization was split into rtl-optimization and tree-optimization i 
believe, and no longer exists as a component.

If somebody could kindly update gccbug.in to have tree-optimization and 
rtl-optimization instead of optimization, that would fix the problem.

I'll do it if nobody gets to it by tomorrow.
--Dan