This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] live analysis on local static functions


> On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 12:34:02AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > There is no way to put same decl into the two lists, so I am not quite
> > sure what to do here.   It is not good idea to always duplicate it
> > either as we will get multiple versions from multiple inline copies of
> > the same functions.
> > Ideas?
> 
> Well, I'm fairly sure that debug info requires the decl to be
> duplicated as well.  I think what is neeed, is that whenever
> cgraph and tree-ssa examine a variable to see if it is used,

cgraph is fine here as it uses hash tables on assembler name.

I am not sure what is proper fix on tree-ssa.
In case we decide that we can rely on fact that the variable is
not shared only for bind exprs, I think all we need is to add
DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN check into that bind expr processing loop.
However that would still leave us with the reload misscompilation
comming from function inlining I am hitting when enable
-funit-at-a-time.  Any idea what other can break on having two instances
of same static variable inside BIND_EXPR node?

Honza

> we must look at the abstract origin.
> 
> 
> r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]