This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.


On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:14:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> A number of places continue to recurse on the arguments of a PLUS_EXPR
> but do not handle EXPR_WITH_FILE_LOCATION, for one thing.

Please name such a place.  I'm asking for specifics here and
getting nothing from yall.

Have yall *tried* WFL and have experimental evidence for how much
of a performance hit you get?  Given that we do extraordinarily
little reasoning with trees on mainline, I have a hard time imagining
that it has much affect at all.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]