This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:14:23PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> A number of places continue to recurse on the arguments of a PLUS_EXPR
> but do not handle EXPR_WITH_FILE_LOCATION, for one thing.
Please name such a place. I'm asking for specifics here and
getting nothing from yall.
Have yall *tried* WFL and have experimental evidence for how much
of a performance hit you get? Given that we do extraordinarily
little reasoning with trees on mainline, I have a hard time imagining
that it has much affect at all.