This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, wilson at specifixinc dot com,jason at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 16:14:23 -0400
Subject: Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
References: <20030922001710.GA24248@alinoe.com> <20030927124920.GA16447@alinoe.com> <20031006174054.GC17794@redhat.com> <20031006190817.GA9460@alinoe.com> <20031006201102.GA5019@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:11:02PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 09:08:17PM +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> > Most code is simply assuming that if an expression is not
> > a CALL_EXP it is not a call - while a CALL_EXP wrapped in
> > a WFL *would* be a call.
> 
> That is a specious argument.  How does this differ from a
> PLUS_EXPR that contains a call?

A number of places continue to recurse on the arguments of a PLUS_EXPR
but do not handle EXPR_WITH_FILE_LOCATION, for one thing.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
  - From: Carlo Wood
- Re: RFA: Adding a location_t (or pointer) to tree_exp for 3.4 only.
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]