This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
- From: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
- To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:53:40 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: Starting to track patches through bugzilla
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> Userids it can't determine (due to non-existent bugzilla accounts or
> not writing from the same email address you use in your bugzilla mail)
> are currently set to me, rather than creating them new accounts. It'll
> likely just be set to an "unknown commenter" account with the from
> pasted into the text of their followup.
I don't want to send patches from hp gcc gnu org but I want to
be that my "official" bugzilla account. Can I make that and
this addresses aliases (and more addresses)?
> An example of this theory is that patches with subjects not starting
> with [PATCH] don't get processed (and any followup referencing them
> won't get processed as a result). This is good enough, since people
> are supposed to do it. Patches that don't do it have the same chance as
> before of being lost in the ether.
Please also [RFA] and [RFA:] (request for approval) as the
convention is, as was suggested last time this came up. (Maybe
RFC too, but IMHO that's a misnomer.)