This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: integral location_t


In message <20030922145823.GA582@alinoe.com>, Carlo Wood writes:
 >On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:53:19AM -0600, law@redhat.com wrote:
 >> Yes.  Effectively every expresssion has a location_t.
 >> 
 >> Jeff
 >
 >I suppose that the new tree-ssa will fix my problem too then?
 >[The problem: a break point at the 'call' to 'h' in "f(h())"
 > where f() is inlined does now give as location the definition
 > of f(), instead of the location of the line "f(h())".]
 >In that case I suppose I only need to concentrate on a temporary
 >fix for 3.4 for that particular case?
We'd have to test that explicitly.  We haven't dove into the line number
mapping in several months (and I know it's not 100% accurate). 

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]