This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
| Other format: | [Raw text] | |
Mmmm, "this eliminates needs" sounds stilted.
Compilation of Objective-C programs is done with the same driver that is used for C programs. This eliminates the need to translate Objective-C programs into C equivalent before assembly code generation.
And I'm unclear if it's still fair to tack on
, and allows for better object code and better debugging capabilities.
?
More importantly, based on another branch of this thread, I'm not sure that the lack of a C intermediate is a significant assertion anyway.
I don't think it is an interesting assertion. It's a true statement, but you can make lots of true and uninteresting statements about intermediate representations that the compiler doesn't have. (e.g. the C compiler doesn't use Fortran as an intermediate language.)
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |