This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Gcc installation problem

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: lfei at ecn dot purdue dot edu, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 12:35:59 -0700
Subject: Re: Gcc installation problem
References: <484B0452-D1B0-11D7-BA09-003065A77310@apple.com>

Mike Stump wrote:

On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 01:46 PM, Dan Kegel wrote:
I don't think it's quite fair to call RH's gcc "2.96" defective;
it's just poorly named.
No, it isn't poorly named either. That happens to be the best name for it.


gcc-2.96-rh would have pissed off gnu less.
- Dan

--
Dan Kegel
http://www.kegel.com
http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Gcc installation problem
  - From: Long Fei

References:
- Re: Gcc installation problem
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]