This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: m68k - Dropping the Motorola syntax
Bernardo Innocenti wrote:
Of course I meant to remove the least used one, which is...
err... mumble mumble... the MIT syntax :-)
The MIT syntax is the one that GNU tools originally supported.
I thought by now gas supports both syntaxes, but are both still
being maintained? Another question is: which syntax do our
dis-assemblers (in gdb and binutils) emit? Obviously, our
toolchain should be self-consistent. It's silly for our
compiler to only support Motorola syntax while gdb emits
(only or by default) MIT syntax or vice versa.