This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit



On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Diego Novillo wrote:

> On Mon, 2003-08-11 at 16:04, Zdenek Dvorak wrote:
>
> > I am not really sure what is the exact meaning of the parent.  Can't you
> > run into problems in cases like
> >
>
> > Anyway, losing concept of parent relationship seems to be relatively
> > small cost in comparison to other gains.
> >
> The only reason why we use the parent relation is to avoid spending time
> building the control dependence information.  That can be costly.  IIRC,
> Jeff Law had done some experiments with that, but they don't seem to be
> in CVS.

It depends how you do it.
If we do it building APT, it would be relatively quick, and we could get
linear time phi placement as a result.

>
>
> Diego.
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]