This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [tree-ssa]: Code movement is a pain in the ass.
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 16:12, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 15:38, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> >
> > > > I meant implementing bsi_move in terms of bsi_remove and bsi_insert.
> > > > Is
> > > > that feasible?
> > > Yes, but it will require adding an extra argument to bsi_remove and
> > > remove_stmt.
> > >
> > Or commonize some of the code in bsi_remove/remove_stmt. Though, if
> > that's too intrusive then I guess we add the argument.
> >
> >
>
> bsi_remove is pretty simple... If you really want to not duplicate that
> piece of code, common it out into a new function, add the parameter and
> call it from bsi_remove. I wouldn't want to see the API to bsi_remove()
> changed.
As you wish.