This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit



On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Andrew MacLeod wrote:

> On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 21:08, Daniel Berlin wrote:
>
> >
> > It appears you broke walk_tree on GIMPLE'd trees.
> > Points-to uses it.
> > If you'd really like me to switch it to use tsi's, i will, but it was
> > written before tsi's existed.
> > :)
>
> In all likelyhood, It will eventually need to be changed. We probably
> wont be using CE nodes in the front end for ever.  Famous last words, I
> know :-) Thats primarily why we provided TSI's.

I'll move it to TSI's soon. Like I said, it was written before TSI's
existed.

>
> Any exercise which removes references to CE nodes in our optimizer code
> is a useful exercise. In fact, before going on vacation I was
> considering going through that exact exercise of at least locating them
> over the next week or two :-)
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]