This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa] RFC: Making control flow more explicit


On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 21:08, Daniel Berlin wrote:

> 
> It appears you broke walk_tree on GIMPLE'd trees.
> Points-to uses it.
> If you'd really like me to switch it to use tsi's, i will, but it was 
> written before tsi's existed.
> :)

In all likelyhood, It will eventually need to be changed. We probably
wont be using CE nodes in the front end for ever.  Famous last words, I
know :-) Thats primarily why we provided TSI's.

Any exercise which removes references to CE nodes in our optimizer code
is a useful exercise. In fact, before going on vacation I was
considering going through that exact exercise of at least locating them
over the next week or two :-)

Andrew




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]