This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
- From: Shaun Jackman <sjackman at pathwayconnect dot com>
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: 01 Jul 2003 10:20:26 -0600
- Subject: Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
- Organization: Pathway Connectivity
- References: <628EEA06-ABDD-11D7-A233-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu>
I was looking at binutils-2.14 and gcc-3.3. Thanks for clearing this up.
Cheers,
Shaun
On Tue, 2003-07-01 at 10:02, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> What version of gcc are you looking at, 3.3?
> In the mainline of the gcc, gcc uses a autoconf based one.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
>
> On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 11:56 US/Eastern, Shaun Jackman wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that binutils and gcc use very different configure.in
> > files. binutils uses an autoconf file, and gcc uses a Cygnus configure
> > shell excerpt. My question now is, for a combined toolchain, which
> > build
> > system is preferred? And, why are there two distinctly different build
> > systems? Are the tools slowly migrating to one or the other, or will
> > there always be two (Star Wars reference aside).
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shaun
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>