This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
- From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- To: Shaun Jackman <sjackman at pathwayconnect dot com>
- Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:02:16 -0400
- Subject: Re: configure.in (Cygnus and autoconf versions)
What version of gcc are you looking at, 3.3?
In the mainline of the gcc, gcc uses a autoconf based one.
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
On Tuesday, Jul 1, 2003, at 11:56 US/Eastern, Shaun Jackman wrote:
I just noticed that binutils and gcc use very different configure.in
files. binutils uses an autoconf file, and gcc uses a Cygnus configure
shell excerpt. My question now is, for a combined toolchain, which
build
system is preferred? And, why are there two distinctly different build
systems? Are the tools slowly migrating to one or the other, or will
there always be two (Star Wars reference aside).
Thanks,
Shaun