Re: PR fortran/9038, a regression in 3.3/3.4 with respect to 3.2.

[Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>]

Neil Booth wrote:
> Toon Moene wrote:-
>
>
> > > > Apparently I still don't understand how this piece of c-opts.c
> > works,
> >
> > > > because the attached patch doesn't solve the problem.
> > >
> > > How does it not work?
> >
> > cc1 still gives the warning:
> >
> > unknown register: line-length-none.

> Hmm.  That's coming from something else; definitely not C switch
> handling.

Definitely.  So the question is: how do we prevent the passing on of 
this switch to the rest of cc1 in case cc1 is called with the -E switch ....

In f771, we just return -1 from ffe_decode_option - does that mean that 
setting `result' to -1 in c_common_decode_option will have the same effect ?

Thanks in advance,

--
Toon Moene - mailto:toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl - phoneto: +31 346 214290
Saturnushof 14, 3738 XG  Maartensdijk, The Netherlands
Maintainer, GNU Fortran 77: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g77_news.html
GNU Fortran 95: http://gcc-g95.sourceforge.net/ (under construction)